![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEbldkeg1uvEhIeafRgGLmkta1qtkPnIqa54GFnzwkunNMzznTsNJRB3-E7wNlq7-fK6WOePt7behkW4ABl8e01H0pXwKSmFsVaKg2oWxuL6dCdHLLilCt0EUQ24182ETKVjx2HW4iwyc/s400/halte1.jpg)
Under the global storm of finnancial markets, there are human beings. To propose contemporary art as a "safe inversion" inside of capitalism, is a simulacrum, a parody, a joke or one capitalistic bussiness more? or all this together? If simulacrum distinguish itself from ilusionim because of the absence of a claim of "faking" our eyes, and is defined by its funcionality, we can answer: functional for whom?
"Halt!", Chemnitz, Doc AC / 2008.